Water Quality Report · Updated October 07, 2026
OCUD/WESTERN REGIONAL WTR SYS (5 WPS)
OCUD/WESTERN REGIONAL WTR SYS (5 WPS) delivers tap water graded C (73/100) by TapWaterSafety.org. The utility serves approximately 206,742 residents in ORLANDO, Florida using groundwater. The most significant water quality concerns are: PFAS contamination; Haloacetic acids (HAA9) significantly above health guideline; Total trihalomethanes (TTHMs) significantly above health guideline; Arsenic significantly above health guideline. For questions, the utility can be reached at 407-254-9500.
Is ORLANDO tap water safe to drink?
OCUD/WESTERN REGIONAL WTR SYS (5 WPS) delivers tap water that earns a grade of C (73/100) from TapWaterSafety.org — an average rating, with several contaminants above health guidelines but generally compliant with US legal limits.
The utility serves 206,742 residents in ORLANDO, drawing from groundwater.
Public testing data identifies 6 contaminants in this water above EWG's health-based guidelines, including: Haloacetic acids (HAA9), Total trihalomethanes (TTHMs), Arsenic, Haloacetic acids (HAA5), Radium, combined (-226 and -228), Perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS). For most residents, a properly certified home filter at the kitchen tap is the most cost-effective way to reduce exposure to whatever's in your water. See our filter recommendations below, matched specifically to this utility's contaminant profile.
EPA compliance record
Official U.S. EPA records for OCUD/WESTERN REGIONAL WTR SYS (5 WPS) (system ID FL3481546) for the last 3 years. Checked 2026-10-07.
| Rule | Type | Since | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stage 2 Disinfectants and Disinfection Byproducts Rule | Missed testing or reporting | 10/02/2006 | Open |
| Revised Total Coliform Rule | Missed testing | 11/01/2023 | Open |
Source: U.S. EPA Enforcement and Compliance History Online (ECHO), from the Safe Drinking Water Information System. See EPA's full report.
Quick actions for ORLANDO residents
Top concerns in this water
Based on the most recent EPA and EWG data, these are the most significant water quality issues for OCUD/WESTERN REGIONAL WTR SYS (5 WPS).
PFAS contamination
Severe concernPerfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) detected. PFAS are persistent chemicals linked to cancer and immune effects with no known safe exposure threshold.
Haloacetic acids (HAA9) significantly above health guideline
Moderate concernHaloacetic acids (HAA9) detected at 21.7 ppb, 361x above the EWG health guideline of 0.06 ppb.
Total trihalomethanes (TTHMs) significantly above health guideline
Moderate concernTotal trihalomethanes (TTHMs) detected at 35.6 ppb, 237x above the EWG health guideline of 0.15 ppb.
Arsenic significantly above health guideline
Moderate concernArsenic detected at 0.733 ppb, 183x above the EWG health guideline of 0.004 ppb.
Contact OCUD/WESTERN REGIONAL WTR SYS (5 WPS)
Reach the utility directly for service issues, water quality concerns, or to request your Consumer Confidence Report.
General Contact
Treatment Plant
Recommended water filters for ORLANDO
Filters matched to the specific contaminants in this water supply.
Filter certified for PFOA/PFOS (NSF/ANSI 53 or 58)
$180-$750Reverse osmosis and some carbon block filters reduce PFAS. Look for certification to NSF/ANSI 53 or 58 for PFOA/PFOS.
Carbon filter certified for VOCs (NSF/ANSI 53)
$180-$599Activated carbon is effective for disinfection byproducts. Look for NSF/ANSI 53 VOC reduction.
Reverse osmosis certified for arsenic (NSF/ANSI 58)
$429-$599Reverse osmosis certified under NSF/ANSI 58 for arsenic is the most reliable home option.
Disclosure: TapWaterSafety earns a commission from purchases made through these links. This does not influence our scoring methodology or filter selection.
Score breakdown
This utility's overall score of 73/100 breaks down across five weighted components. Read the full methodology →
Contaminants detected — international standards comparison
Every contaminant detected, compared side-by-side against US EPA legal limits, the EU Drinking Water Directive (2020/2184), WHO Guidelines, and California's Public Health Goal (the strictest US benchmark). Why we show multiple standards →
| Contaminant | Detected | EWG US health-based |
EPA US legal |
EU DWD Europe |
WHO global |
CA PHG strictest US |
Tested sample year |
Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Haloacetic acids (HAA9) Disinfection byproduct |
21.7 ppb | 0.06 | — | — | — | — | — | 361× over |
| Total trihalomethanes (TTHMs) Disinfection byproduct |
35.6 ppb | 0.15 | 80.0 | 100 | — | — | — | 237× over |
| Arsenic Heavy metal |
0.733 ppb | 0.004 | 10.0 | 10 | 10 | 0.004 | — | 183× over |
| Haloacetic acids (HAA5) Disinfection byproduct |
12.2 ppb | 0.1 | 60.0 | 60 | — | — | — | 122× over |
| Radium, combined (-226 and -228) Radiological |
0.58 pCi/L | 0.05 | 5.0 | — | — | — | — | 12× over |
| Perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) PFAS |
1.94 ppt | 0.3 | 4.0 | 100 | 100 | 1 | — | 6.5× over |
| Chromium (hexavalent) Heavy metal |
0.0157 ppb | 0.02 | — | — | — | — | — | Below guideline |
| Chlorate Disinfection byproduct |
126.8 ppb | 210.0 | — | — | — | — | — | Below guideline |
| Nitrate Inorganic |
0.0206 ppm | 0.14 | 10.0 | 11.3 | 11.3 | 10 | — | Below guideline |
| Molybdenum Other |
4.1 ppb | 40.0 | — | — | — | — | — | Below guideline |
| Chloromethane Other |
0.235 ppb | 2.69 | — | — | — | — | — | Below guideline |
| Barium Heavy metal |
13.8 ppb | 700.0 | 2000.0 | — | 1300 | 2000 | — | Below guideline |
| Manganese Heavy metal |
1.93 ppb | 100.0 | — | 50 | 80 | — | — | Below guideline |
| Antimony Heavy metal |
0.0167 ppb | 1.0 | 6.0 | 10 | 20 | 1 | — | Below guideline |
| Vanadium Other |
0.125 ppb | 21.0 | — | — | — | — | — | Below guideline |
| Strontium Radiological |
0.191 ppb | 1500.0 | — | — | — | — | — | Below guideline |
| Cyanide Inorganic |
0.283 ppb | — | 200.0 | 50 | 70 | 150 | — | Below guideline |
| Fluoride Inorganic |
0.2 ppm | — | 4.0 | 1.5 | 1.5 | — | — | Below guideline |
| Permethrin Other |
0.054 ppb | — | — | — | — | — | — | Below guideline |
All values in the unit of the detected level. Red cells indicate the detected level exceeds that standard. Some contaminants have limits in some jurisdictions but not others (shown as —). The "Tested" column shows the year each contaminant sample was collected.
Sources: US EPA, EU Drinking Water Directive 2020/2184, WHO Guidelines (4th ed.), California OEHHA PHGs, EWG Tap Water Database.
OCUD/WESTERN REGIONAL WTR SYS (5 WPS) service area
This water system serves 1 community in Orange County, Florida. Click any city for its dedicated tap water quality page.
Find the right filter for ORLANDO water
Browse filter categories by water-quality concern. Each option below is NSF-certified for the matched contaminant type.